000			03194nam a2200349Ia 4500
003			CIESS
005			20230831180209.0
008			230106c20012009mx kr pqon 0 0eng c
022			_a1870-2961
040			_aBiblioteca CIESS _bspa _cBiblioteca CIESS _dgvzj
041			_aeng
082			_aREV WSP No.9
100	1		_aBorraz, Fernando _924094
245	1	0	_aPANES: targeting and impact _ceditor invitado Gonzalo Hernández L.
260			_aMéxico _bCISS _bUIA _c2009
300			_a41-83 p. _bil. _c22 cm.
310			_aSemestral
362			_aRevista Well-being and Social Policy, Vol. 5, No. 2, Second semester 2009
440			_aChallenges in the evaluation of social programs. _928744
500			_aTítulo en español: PANES: focalización e impacto .
504			_aBibliografía p. 82-83.
520			_aThis research paper intends to quantifit targeting performance in terms of the efficiency of the 1 National Plan for Social Emergency Assistance (PANES) implemented in Uruguay between 2005 and 2007 and determine its impact on relevant issues such as school attendance, child labor and the labor market. For this analysis , we used 2006 and 2007 Continual Household Survey (ECH) data. Our outcomes show that in 2007, 27% of the eligible households in Montevideo and other urban areas were not able to enter the program. In addition, less than 2% of the non-eligible households received program benefits. Even though this allows us to conclude that program targeting was actually not high, targeting indicators show noticeable improvement when compared to indicators for 2006. Additionally, there are no signs of discontinuity around the thresholds set in djerent regions to gain access to the program. This invalidates the regression discontinuity method used to evaluate program impact. As regards the evaluation, estimates made using the propensity score matching estimator show that PANES has not had significant impact on school attendance or child labor. In addition, adverse labor market effects are observed in terms of worked hours in urban areas other than Montevideo for both men and women. Quantitatively, a reduction in the number of worked hours by individuals who participated in PANES is observed, around 1.4% for men and 8% for women. It is worth mentioning that effects observed on the labor market relate only to worked hours and not to participation in the labor force. As regards informality, a non significant increase is observed. No impacts on the labor supply, labor force participation or informality are observed for Montevideo.
538			_aPDF 678 KB
650			_aSeguridad social _vPublicaciones periódicas _zMéxico _920432
650			_aSeguridad social _xTransferencias _zUruguay _924095
700	1		_aGonzález, Nicolás
710			_aConferencia Interamericana de Seguridad Social _9114
710			_aUniversidad Iberoamericana. Ciudad de México _923683
856			_uhttp://162.222.203.113/Analiticas/ADISS2016-390.pdf _zDisponible ADISS2016-390
942			_cART _2ddc
999			_c30313 _d30313
773	0		_032179 _923738 _aConferencia Interamericana de Seguridad Social _b _dMéxico CISS UI 2006-2014 _o027551 _tWell-being and social policy _w _x1870-2961 _z